Wente Cases

facebook 001 64x64  Twitter 001 64x64  Google Plus 001 64x64  YouTube 001 64x64  instagram  nathan wente avvo rating

Case Evaluation >
541-944-9880
3 minutes reading time (651 words)

Welcome to the Real World

Case Summary:

The Defendant was charged with a single count of theft. The incident arose after the victim had lost their wallet in a grocery store. Upon locating the wallet, the victim asserted cash was missing. Surveillance video was reviewed and the Defendant was subsequently charged. The case ultimately was dismissed after the Defendant agreed to a civil compromise.

Attorney Comments:

"This is a case that will stay with me forever. It is a great example of just how easily it is for the government to destroy people's lives. The condensed story is as follows:

A short time before the theft from the wallet my client had been witnessed allegedly having a counterfeit bill. He had tried to pay for some groceries and the store reported the purported counterfeit bill to law enforcement. During that investigation law enforcement obtained my client's identity, but they never did anything else.

(For those of you assuming my client's guilt in this regard, I can tell you that IF the bill was counterfeit it was not intentional. There was no evidence given to me that the bill was counterfeit because there was no case.)

Shortly after that incident the wallet theft occurred. Law enforcement responded to the store to investigate the theft. When law enforcement arrived, they were given access to see the video surveillance. The officer watched the video. This video was poor quality and the camera was at a great distance making it even more difficult to be able to identify the person who took the wallet. However, the video did show a person whose hair color was different than my client's. Further, law enforcement had the name of the card holder that was used to pay for the suspect's groceries that day. Law enforcement didn't bother trying to track that person down. Finally, to further complicate the case, law enforcement waited nearly 3 months to file and notify my client that they were charging him with a crime he knew nothing about.

Imagine getting charged with theft of money from 3 months prior and not knowing anything about it because it was not you.

Imagine trying desperately to come up with some sort of documentation that could provide an alibi to prove to the government that it was not you. But, because you do not know exactly where you were or what you were doing at that exact time 3 months ago, you can't.

Imagine risking going to jail because a police officer promised that he would come to court and testify under oath that you are a person he has never met, BUT he saw you on a grainy crappy surveillance video and that you are the same person that was seen on a surveillance video days or weeks before at a completely different location.

Imagine living in a society where the people who are going to be your jurors are so trusting of law enforcement that you have fear that those people MIGHT believe you were actually the thief because the police officer "said so."

Imagine if you could pay the victim $500, which is the same amount the victim claimed was stolen, and the government would agree to dismiss the case.

Imagine if fighting the case was going to cost exponentially more than $500 and take a huge toll on your physical and mental well-being and, even though you are 100% innocent of the allegation, you opt to pay $500 just to have it go away so you can go back to your life.

Imagine that this kind of thing happens every day, in every court, and in every state. To quote one of my favorite movies, "Welcome to the real world."

Josephine County, Oregon

Actual Case Summaries
Be advised that I never promise a client a particular outcome, details of prior cases should not be taken as an indication that other clients will necessarily see the same results.

Anger Management
Fighting a Speeding Ticket from a Traffic Camera

Related Posts

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Guest
Tuesday, 28 June 2022

Captcha Image

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://wentelaw.com/

Before You Hire An Attorney

 

Stay Informed

 

best defense attorney medford oregon More Than a Lawyer

Nate Wente is more than just an attorney, he is a friend.
Read More Testimonials >

best defense attorney medford oregon Taking Control in Uncertainty

Wente stopped me from taking a bad deal and may have saved me time in jail
Read More Testimonials >

best defense attorney medford oregon Understand The Alternatives

He is not a “let’s just make a deal” attorney.
Read More Testimonials >

AVVO Ratings

avvo rating nathan d wente attorney

Expertise Ratings

Expertise Best DUI Lawyer Medford 2021 badge Wente Law

 

 

facebook 001 64x64  Twitter 001 64x64  Google Plus 001 64x64  YouTube 001 64x64

instagram  avvo nathan wente  attorney office medford google maps  attorney office yreka california google maps

Call Nathan D. Wente     541-944-9880

What To Expect

nathan d wente medford attorney

When you come to me for legal assistance, I'll use my experience as a former deputy district attorney to build your defense. Discuss the details of your criminal charge or concern with me, and I’ll determine the best approach to defending your case. You’ll breathe a little easier knowing that a knowledgeable attorney is by your side.

Nathan D. Wente
Attorney At Law

 

Contact Info.

 


Law Office Medford, Oregon

Nathan D Wente, Attorney at Law
311 South Holly St., Suite B
Medford, OR 97501
PH: 541-944-9880
Call for an appointment


Law Office Yreka, California


Nathan D Wente, Attorney at Law
214 Lane Street 
Yreka, CA 96097
PH: 541-944-9880
Call for an appointment


Endorsements

 

"I endorse this lawyer. You will not find a lawyer with more heart, energy, and commitment to justice than Nate. Nate will fight to protect your rights. Nate has experience trying a variety of criminal cases. To Nate, being a lawyer is not a vocation, or a way to make money....it is a calling to protect our sacred rights as individuals."

David Devilleneuve, Personal injury Attorney on Apr 23, 2013
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

Read More Nathan D. Wente Endorsements >